okgr

Inequalities involving fractions

  • calculus
  • algebra

It’s easy to solve inequalities like the following:

2x+57    2x75    2x2    x1\begin{split} & -2x + 5 \leq 7 \newline & \implies -2x \leq 7 - 5 \newline & \implies -2x \leq 2 \newline & \implies x \geq -1 \newline \end{split}

We reverse the sign because xx coefficient was negative. If you substituted 00 for xx into the equation, it holds. This is standard inequality exercise all of us can do. But while solving some examples, I was met with a sample below:

x7x+3>2\frac{x - 7}{x + 3} \gt 2

If you went straight to treat this just like you would with equalities, you’ll end up with the solution 13>x-13 \gt x. Which is wrong. If you substituted 14-14, for example, into the equation, you get 1.91.9 which is not greater than 2.

How do we solve this then? First, we need to understand that the denominator (x+3)(x + 3) cannot be 00. From that understanding, it means our xx solution can be on either sides of 3-3 on the number line.

3-3 because when x+3=0x + 3 = 0, then x=3x = -3. I hope that was clear.

This means we have to solve twice; once for when x+3>0x + 3 > 0 (ie, x>3x > -3) and when x+3<0x + 3 < 0 (ie, x<3x < -3).

When (x+3)>0(x + 3) > 0

x7x+3>2    x7>2(x+3)    x7>2x+6    13>x\begin{split} & \frac{x - 7}{x + 3} \gt 2\newline \implies & x - 7 \gt 2(x + 3)\newline \implies & x - 7 \gt 2x + 6\newline \implies & -13 \gt x \end{split}

But we already established that this is false. And also x<13x < -13 contradicts x>3x > -3.

Now let’s solve for when (x+3)<0(x + 3) < 0. Because (x+3)(x + 3) is negative (ie, less than), we will flip the inequality. You can think of this as multiplying through by 1-1 (or 11\frac{1}{-1}).

x7x+3<2    x7<2(x+3)    x7<2x+6    13<x\begin{split} & \frac{x - 7}{x + 3} \lt 2\newline \implies & x - 7 \lt 2(x + 3)\newline \implies & x - 7 \lt 2x + 6\newline \implies & -13 \lt x \end{split}

When we test with 12-12, the inequality should now hold. And x>13x > -13 satisfies x<3x < -3. That is if you listed numbers greater than 13-13, you’ll find some that fall below 3-3. This means 13<x<3-13 < x < -3. If you test values in that range, you’ll find that they satisfy the inequality.

If you’re lost, you may need to take this slowly with a number of repetitions.

Note that, you wouldn’t always have your answers on only one partition on the number line. They could be on both.

Some patterns I noticed while solving some examples are:

  1. When the solution contradicts the range defined by a direction, discard it; as seen with solving for when x+3>0x + 3 > 0.

  2. If it satifies the range defined by the direction, keep it.

    • The solution or the range may overlap each other. You should keep the only one that covers both. For example, say in the direction of x<3x < 3, you got x<10x < 10. Notice here that all values below 1010 also fall under 33. So we keep just x<3x < 3 as our solution.

      Try this:

    x+4x3<2\frac{x + 4}{x - 3} < 2